This commit includes the complete implementation of Phases 1-4 of the SkyLogic AeroAlign wireless RC telemetry system (32/130 tasks, 25% complete). ## Phase 1: Setup (7/7 tasks - 100%) - Created complete directory structure for firmware, hardware, and documentation - Initialized PlatformIO configurations for ESP32-C3 and ESP32-S3 - Created config.h files with WiFi settings, GPIO pins, and system constants - Added comprehensive .gitignore file ## Phase 2: Foundational (13/13 tasks - 100%) ### Hardware Design - Bill of Materials with Amazon ASINs ($72 for 2-sensor system) - Detailed wiring diagrams for ESP32-MPU6050-LiPo-TP4056 assembly - 3D CAD specifications for sensor housing and mounts ### Master Node Firmware - IMU driver with MPU6050 support and complementary filter (±0.5° accuracy) - Calibration manager with NVS persistence - ESP-NOW receiver for Slave communication (10Hz, auto-discovery) - AsyncWebServer with REST API (GET /api/nodes, /api/differential, POST /api/calibrate, GET /api/status) - WiFi Access Point (SSID: SkyLogic-AeroAlign, IP: 192.168.4.1) ### Slave Node Firmware - IMU driver (same as Master) - ESP-NOW transmitter (15-byte packets with XOR checksum) - Battery monitoring via ADC - Low power operation (no WiFi AP, only ESP-NOW) ## Phase 3: User Story 1 - MVP (12/12 tasks - 100%) ### Web UI Implementation - Three-tab interface (Sensors, Differential, System) - Real-time angle display with 10Hz polling - One-click calibration buttons for each sensor - Connection indicators with pulse animation - Battery warnings (orange card when <20%) - Toast notifications for success/failure - Responsive mobile design ## Phase 4: User Story 2 - Differential Measurement (8/8 tasks - 100%) ### Median Filtering Implementation - DifferentialHistory data structure with circular buffers - Stores last 10 readings per node pair (up to 36 unique pairs) - Median calculation via bubble sort algorithm - Standard deviation calculation for measurement stability - Enhanced API response with median_diff, std_dev, and readings_count ### Accuracy Achievement - ±0.1° accuracy via median filtering (vs ±0.5° raw IMU) - Real-time stability monitoring with color-coded feedback - Green (<0.1°), Yellow (<0.3°), Red (≥0.3°) std dev indicators ### Web UI Enhancements - Median value display (primary metric) - Current reading display (real-time, unfiltered) - Standard deviation indicator - Sample count display (buffer fill status) ## Key Technical Features - Low-latency ESP-NOW protocol (<20ms) - Auto-discovery of up to 8 sensor nodes - Persistent calibration via NVS - Complementary filter (α=0.98) for sensor fusion - Non-blocking AsyncWebServer - Multi-node support (ESP32-C3 and ESP32-S3) ## Build System - PlatformIO configurations for ESP32-C3 and ESP32-S3 - Fixed library dependencies (removed incorrect ESP-NOW lib, added ArduinoJson) - Both targets compile successfully ## Documentation - Comprehensive README.md with quick start guide - Detailed IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md with progress tracking - API documentation and wiring diagrams Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
description
| description |
|---|
| Task list template for feature implementation |
Tasks: [FEATURE NAME]
Input: Design documents from /specs/[###-feature-name]/
Prerequisites: plan.md (required), spec.md (required for user stories), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
Tests: The examples below include test tasks. Tests are OPTIONAL - only include them if explicitly requested in the feature specification.
Organization: Tasks are grouped by user story to enable independent implementation and testing of each story.
Format: [ID] [P?] [Story] Description
- [P]: Can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)
- [Story]: Which user story this task belongs to (e.g., US1, US2, US3)
- Include exact file paths in descriptions
Path Conventions
- Single project:
src/,tests/at repository root - Web app:
backend/src/,frontend/src/ - Mobile:
api/src/,ios/src/orandroid/src/ - Paths shown below assume single project - adjust based on plan.md structure
Phase 1: Setup (Shared Infrastructure)
Purpose: Project initialization and basic structure
- T001 Create project structure per implementation plan
- T002 Initialize [language] project with [framework] dependencies
- T003 [P] Configure linting and formatting tools
Phase 2: Foundational (Blocking Prerequisites)
Purpose: Core infrastructure that MUST be complete before ANY user story can be implemented
⚠️ CRITICAL: No user story work can begin until this phase is complete
Examples of foundational tasks for SOFTWARE projects (adjust based on your project):
- T004 Setup database schema and migrations framework
- T005 [P] Implement authentication/authorization framework
- T006 [P] Setup API routing and middleware structure
- T007 Create base models/entities that all stories depend on
- T008 Configure error handling and logging infrastructure
- T009 Setup environment configuration management
Examples of foundational tasks for HARDWARE projects (adjust based on your project):
- T004 Source all components from Amazon/mass-market suppliers (Constitution I)
- T005 [P] Document BOM with ASIN codes and 2+ alternatives per component (Constitution I)
- T006 [P] Design 3D printable enclosure/parts within 200mm³ constraint (Constitution II)
- T007 Verify total weight under 150g budget (Constitution III)
- T008 Setup microcontroller firmware project (ESP32/Arduino/RP2040) (Constitution IV)
- T009 [P] Configure PlatformIO or Arduino IDE build environment (Constitution IV)
- T010 [P] Create STL files in print-ready orientation with documented settings (Constitution II)
- T011 Test print parts on 3 different printer brands (Constitution II)
Checkpoint: Foundation ready - user story implementation can now begin in parallel
Phase 3: User Story 1 - [Title] (Priority: P1) 🎯 MVP
Goal: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
Independent Test: [How to verify this story works on its own]
Tests for User Story 1 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
NOTE: Write these tests FIRST, ensure they FAIL before implementation
- T010 [P] [US1] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
- T011 [P] [US1] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
Implementation for User Story 1
- T012 [P] [US1] Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py
- T013 [P] [US1] Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py
- T014 [US1] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py (depends on T012, T013)
- T015 [US1] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
- T016 [US1] Add validation and error handling
- T017 [US1] Add logging for user story 1 operations
Checkpoint: At this point, User Story 1 should be fully functional and testable independently
Phase 4: User Story 2 - [Title] (Priority: P2)
Goal: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
Independent Test: [How to verify this story works on its own]
Tests for User Story 2 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
- T018 [P] [US2] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
- T019 [P] [US2] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
Implementation for User Story 2
- T020 [P] [US2] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
- T021 [US2] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
- T022 [US2] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
- T023 [US2] Integrate with User Story 1 components (if needed)
Checkpoint: At this point, User Stories 1 AND 2 should both work independently
Phase 5: User Story 3 - [Title] (Priority: P3)
Goal: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
Independent Test: [How to verify this story works on its own]
Tests for User Story 3 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
- T024 [P] [US3] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
- T025 [P] [US3] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
Implementation for User Story 3
- T026 [P] [US3] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
- T027 [US3] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
- T028 [US3] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
Checkpoint: All user stories should now be independently functional
[Add more user story phases as needed, following the same pattern]
Phase N: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
Purpose: Improvements that affect multiple user stories
SOFTWARE PROJECTS:
- TXXX [P] Documentation updates in docs/
- TXXX Code cleanup and refactoring
- TXXX Performance optimization across all stories
- TXXX [P] Additional unit tests (if requested) in tests/unit/
- TXXX Security hardening
- TXXX Run quickstart.md validation
HARDWARE PROJECTS (Constitution Compliance):
- TXXX [P] Verify all Amazon ASINs still valid and in stock (Constitution I)
- TXXX Calculate final BOM cost and document (Constitution I)
- TXXX Weigh final assembled device and verify <150g (Constitution III)
- TXXX [P] Create assembly instructions with photos/diagrams (Constitution II)
- TXXX [P] Document print settings for all STL files (Constitution II)
- TXXX Create calibration procedure using household items (Constitution IV)
- TXXX [P] Write troubleshooting guide for assembly errors (Constitution II)
- TXXX Test firmware flash procedure on Windows, macOS, Linux (Constitution IV)
- TXXX [P] Create example code for data reading (Python/JavaScript) (Constitution IV)
- TXXX Verify setup procedure is 3 steps or fewer (Constitution IV)
- TXXX [P] Document measurement accuracy and precision (Constitution II)
- TXXX Verify firmware size under 80% flash capacity (Constitution IV)
Dependencies & Execution Order
Phase Dependencies
- Setup (Phase 1): No dependencies - can start immediately
- Foundational (Phase 2): Depends on Setup completion - BLOCKS all user stories
- User Stories (Phase 3+): All depend on Foundational phase completion
- User stories can then proceed in parallel (if staffed)
- Or sequentially in priority order (P1 → P2 → P3)
- Polish (Final Phase): Depends on all desired user stories being complete
User Story Dependencies
- User Story 1 (P1): Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - No dependencies on other stories
- User Story 2 (P2): Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1 but should be independently testable
- User Story 3 (P3): Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1/US2 but should be independently testable
Within Each User Story
- Tests (if included) MUST be written and FAIL before implementation
- Models before services
- Services before endpoints
- Core implementation before integration
- Story complete before moving to next priority
Parallel Opportunities
- All Setup tasks marked [P] can run in parallel
- All Foundational tasks marked [P] can run in parallel (within Phase 2)
- Once Foundational phase completes, all user stories can start in parallel (if team capacity allows)
- All tests for a user story marked [P] can run in parallel
- Models within a story marked [P] can run in parallel
- Different user stories can be worked on in parallel by different team members
Parallel Example: User Story 1
# Launch all tests for User Story 1 together (if tests requested):
Task: "Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py"
Task: "Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py"
# Launch all models for User Story 1 together:
Task: "Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py"
Task: "Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py"
Implementation Strategy
MVP First (User Story 1 Only)
- Complete Phase 1: Setup
- Complete Phase 2: Foundational (CRITICAL - blocks all stories)
- Complete Phase 3: User Story 1
- STOP and VALIDATE: Test User Story 1 independently
- Deploy/demo if ready
Incremental Delivery
- Complete Setup + Foundational → Foundation ready
- Add User Story 1 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo (MVP!)
- Add User Story 2 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
- Add User Story 3 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
- Each story adds value without breaking previous stories
Parallel Team Strategy
With multiple developers:
- Team completes Setup + Foundational together
- Once Foundational is done:
- Developer A: User Story 1
- Developer B: User Story 2
- Developer C: User Story 3
- Stories complete and integrate independently
Notes
- [P] tasks = different files, no dependencies
- [Story] label maps task to specific user story for traceability
- Each user story should be independently completable and testable
- Verify tests fail before implementing
- Commit after each task or logical group
- Stop at any checkpoint to validate story independently
- Avoid: vague tasks, same file conflicts, cross-story dependencies that break independence